
Once a respected classic, Uriah Smith's Thoughts on Daniel and the Revelation is now often dismissed as outdated, with some critics even making extreme claims about its author. Those who uphold the book's interpretations are labeled fringe, forming two distinct camps. Yet the real issue runs deeper than differing opinions about a book—it centers on two very different prophetic interpretations and the contrasting principles used to understand Daniel and Revelation.

*By registering for this you consent to receive further email communications from us concerning news, events and new releases. You may unsubscribe from our email list at any time.